What is Enterprise 2.0?

I love it when someone does a useful, instructive job explaining terms we take for granted here in technology. Lee Lefever nailed “Wikis in Plain English” with his video. Scott Gavin explains the potentially trendy term Enterprise 2.0 simply. Although Andrew McAfee is without doubt the authoritative author on the subject of Enterprise 2.0, Scott hit the basics.

Scott even said it was “social software within the firewall” which was refreshing to see with all the blather that everything must be hosted. The fact is most enterprises want something as vital as the content on a wiki behind the firewall. Not all surely, but the lion’s share.

What still leaves me wanting about everyone’s definition of Enterprise 2.0 is that it misses an important point: Enterprise 2.0 is just another natural evolution towards lighter weight software. Doesn’t matter if it hosted, behind the firewall, social or not. Companies embraced the open source movement and software-as-a-service because they were fed up with traditional enterprise software. Lightweight software is just another movement serving this same frustration and need.

Lightweight software serves a gap in the enterprise which Jonathan Nolen articulated in an interview:

“We think there’s a huge middle ground between open source and enterprise software that hasn’t been addressed—lightweight software,” Nolen said.

This movement to lighter weight software is broader than the typical definitions of Enterprise 2.0 software. It’s about customers wanting easy to use, practical, easy to install (or hosted) software that is far less expensive and that does not entail an arduous, painful purchasing process. It’s should be simple, straightforward and easy to buy. In fact, it’s not about sales in our opinion at Atlassian.

This is why some of us believe that Enterprise 2.0 is not just about social software. It’s about a fundamental shift in the complexity and cost of software.

8 responses to “What is Enterprise 2.0?

  1. Jeffrey understands that Enterprise 2.0 is about real tools for real people. It’s not about flights of fancy. Take a look at this post for more:

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/?p=340

    Michael Krigsman
    http://projectfailures.com

  2. Pingback: » Failure 2.0 | IT Project Failures | ZDNet.com

  3. Pingback: Enterprise 3.0: Where Is It Headed? - Interesting Panel with the Wrong Title| Zoli’s Blog

  4. Pingback: Will Google Enter the Business Applications Market?| Zoli’s Blog

  5. Jeffrey,

    It sounds like the software companies are learning the power of interacting along with making things simple, which is always a winning combination.

  6. Pingback: Redux: Will Google Enter the Business Applications Market? | CloudAve

  7. Pingback: Redux: Will Google Enter the Business Applications Market?

  8. Pingback: Redux: Will Google Enter the Business Applications Market? | Zoli's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s